reamon
02-22-2002, 17:09
Many of you may be participants of the webmethods-l reflector on ITtoolbox. It has been a good source of information and candid discussion.
I've recently had a message blocked by the moderator because the message made reference to this site (www.wmusers.com), a site that ITtoolbox considers to be a "competitor." I believe that our illustrious www.wmusers.com webmaster Dan Green has also had messages blocked for similar reasons.
This policy isn't explicitly listed on their terms of use pages but could presumably be inferred from other policies that prohibit bare reference to any other site.
IMO, this policy is short-sighted and hurtful to the webMethods user community. I'm interested in hearing other opinions about whether ITtoolbox is being fair or unfair on this topic.
I've recently had a message blocked by the moderator because the message made reference to this site (www.wmusers.com), a site that ITtoolbox considers to be a "competitor." I believe that our illustrious www.wmusers.com webmaster Dan Green has also had messages blocked for similar reasons.
This policy isn't explicitly listed on their terms of use pages but could presumably be inferred from other policies that prohibit bare reference to any other site.
IMO, this policy is short-sighted and hurtful to the webMethods user community. I'm interested in hearing other opinions about whether ITtoolbox is being fair or unfair on this topic.